General
In the Matter of the Application of Jay Leo Rothschild, Appellant, for an Order Pursuant to Section 475 of the Judiciary Law to Determine and Enforce an Attorney's Lien. Louis Schienberg, Respondent
246 A.D. 814·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Jay Leo Rothschild, Appellant, for an Order Pursuant to Section 475 of the Judiciary Law to Determine and Enforce an Attorney’s Lien. Louis Schienberg, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Proceeding to determine and enforce attorney’s lien. Order, so far as appealed from, confirming referee’s report and denying petitioner’s motion to enforce his lien on the basis of an oral modification of the original written retainer, and limiting petitioner’s lien to $100, unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.