General
RENFROW v. GILLESPIE
261 F. 49·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1919
Before HOOK and STONE, Circuit Judges, and AMIDON, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RENFROW v. GILLESPIE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
November 5, 1919.)
No. 5344.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge.
Suit between William A. Renfrow and E. N. Gillespie. From a decree for the latter, the former appeals.
Affirmed.
John B. Arnold, of New York City, and P. W. Cress, of Perry, Old., for appellant.
Robert J. Dodds, of Philadelphia, Pa„ and C. B. Ames, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (W. A. Sipe, Jr., of Tulsa, Okl., on the brief), for appellee.
Before HOOK and STONE, Circuit Judges, and AMIDON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — STONE, Circuit Judge.]
STONE, Circuit Judge.
This case is a companion case to Frank Wright v. E. N. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 46,-C. C. A.-(Dennis O’Donnell v. E. N. Gillespie, 201 Fed. 48, -C. C. A.--and R. F. Howe v. E. N. Gillespie. 261 Fed. 48, - C. C. A. — , decided during this term. For the reasons given in those cases the judgment in this case is affirmed.