Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Irene SMITH, Appellant, v. E. A. LYNCH, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Irene Smith, Bankrupt, Appellee
61 F.2d 1040·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Irene SMITH, Appellant, v. E. A. LYNCH, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Irene Smith, Bankrupt, Appellee.
No. 7008.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 21, 1932.
Oregon Smith, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and CAVANAH, District Jiidge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of petition of Irene Smith for allowance of appeal under section 24b of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 USCA § 47 (b), it is ordered that said petition be, and hereby is, denied, because it was filed after expiration of thirty-day period.