Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Larry Dale BAXTER v. STATE of Arkansas

314 Ark. 539862 S.W.2d 282·Arkansas Supreme Court·1993·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Larry Dale BAXTER v. STATE of Arkansas CR 93-1098 862 S.W.2d 282 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 25, 1993 Albert Wayne Davis, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Appellant, Larry Dale Baxter, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, A. Wayne Davis, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.