Contracts · MBE-tested
LELAND G. STANFORD, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent
16 Cal. 2d 252·Supreme Court of California·1940·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[L. A. No. 17478.
In Bank.
October 1, 1940.]
LELAND G. STANFORD, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
Bertrand L. Comparet for Petitioner.
Philbrick McCoy, Fred E. Lindley, Frank Downer, Arthur F. H. Wright, Claude Minard and Philbrick McCoy for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
This is a petition to review a recoinmendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that petitioner be disbarred. In prior proceedings an order of disbarment was made against petitioner, based upon different charges. This order of disbarment has become final. (See Stanford v. The State Bar, 15 Cal. (2d) 721 [104 Pac. (2d) 635].)
No useful purpose can be served by further consideration' of this petition for review.
The proceeding for review is dismissed.