General
PRISCO v. UNITED STATES
287 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1923
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PRISCO v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 14, 1923.)
No. 155.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Anthony Prisco was convicted of an offense, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
David P. Siegel and Nathan -Lieberman, both of New York City, for plaintiff in error. William Hayward, U. S. Atty., and Abraham I. Menin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New York City.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYEE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.