Torts · MBE-tested
CLARENCE PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent
34 Ariz. 1266 P. 1118·Arizona Supreme Court·1928·AZ
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Criminal No. 674.
Filed May 14, 1928.]
[266 Pac. 1118.]
CLARENCE PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.
Mr. V. L. Hash, for Appellant.
Mr. John W. Murphy, Attorney General, for the State.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
An inspection of the record discloses that appellant was informed against by the county attorney for assault with a deadly weapon, and upon a trial, regularly had, found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison. We have examined the record (although appellant has hot attempted to aid us) for error, and, finding none) the judgment of conviction is affirmed.