Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
The Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. B. F. Allen
214 U.S. 527·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CASES DISPOSED OF WITHOUT CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT FROM FEBRUARY 24 TO JUNE 1, 1909.
No. 155.
The Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. B. F. Allen.
In error to the .Supreme Court of the-State of,Texas.
February 24, 1909.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. W. L. Hall, for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. John F. Dillon, Mr. D. D. Duncan and Mr. W. L. Hall for-plaintiffs in error.
No appearance for. defendánt in error.