Torts · MBE-tested
THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. E. G. De LONG et al., Respondents
75 Cal. App. 789·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1925·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 2925.
Third Appellate District.
November 27, 1925.]
THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. E. G. De LONG et al., Respondents.
Nuisances — Abatement — Prior Notice to Owners. — Judgment reversed upon authority of People v. Burkett, ante, p. 349.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. H. D. Gregory, Judge. Reversed.
The questions presented in this case are the same as in People v. Burkett, ante, p. 349.
William E. Rothe, District Attorney, and Clinton W. Johnson, Deputy District Attorney, for Appellant.
Bond & Deirup for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint. The questions presented by the appeal are in all respects the same as those considered by this court in the case of People v. Burkett et al., ante, p. 349 [242 Pac. 1073]. For the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment is reversed and the trial court is directed to overrule the demurrer.