Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
ESTATE of Charles G. BLAKE, Deceased, per Nathaniel Wright, Union Trust Building, Cincinnati, Ohio, as Executor of Said Estate, and Nathaniel Wright and Fourth & Central Trust Company of Cincinnati, Ohio, as Trustees of Said Estate, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
22 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ESTATE of Charles G. BLAKE, Deceased, per Nathaniel Wright, Union Trust Building, Cincinnati, Ohio, as Executor of Said Estate, and Nathaniel Wright and Fourth & Central Trust Company of Cincinnati, Ohio, as Trustees of Said Estate, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
October 3, 1927.
No. 4883.
Petition to Review an Order of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.
Murray Seasongood and C. B. Wilby, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioners.
A. W. Gregg, Gen. Counsel Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed pursuant to request of counsel for appellants.