Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Moskow et al. v. Boston Redevelopment Authority et al.
382 U.S. 983·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 745.
Moskow et al. v. Boston Redevelopment Authority et al.
James W. Kelleher and Edgar L. Kelley for petitioners.
Lewis H. Weinstein and Loyd M. Starrett for Boston Redevelopment Authority; William H. Kerr for the City of Boston et al.; Edward W. Brooke, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and David Berman, Assistant Attorney General, for the Director of the Division of Urban Renewal; and Richard Wait for New England Merchants National Bank of Boston et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.