Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Hill, Attorney General of Texas v. Stone et al.
416 U.S. 963·Supreme Court of the United States·1974
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.-
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 25, 1974
No. A-986.
Hill, Attorney General of Texas v. Stone et al.
[MAJORITY]
D. C. N. D. Tex. Application for partial stay, presented to Mr. Justice-Powell, and -by him referred to the Court, granted. It is ordered that the judgment be stayed to the extent that it prohibits the use of dual-box election procedure.. Stay order is to remain in effect pending -timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court. If the appeal is timely filed' this stay shall, remain in effect- pending issuance of judgment of "this Court.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.-