Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Winzelberg v. R. K. Baking Corp. et al.
363 U.S. 804·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 882.
Winzelberg v. R. K. Baking Corp. et al.
Morris D. Forkosch for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Standau E. Weinbrecht for the National Labor Relations Board, William B. Rothschild for R. K. Baking Corp., and Samuel J. Cohen for Bakery and Pastry Drivers and Helpers Union, Local No. 802, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.