General
HALL v. STATE
222 Ala. 26130 So. 533·Alabama Supreme Court·1930·AL
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(130 So. 533)
HALL v. STATE.
6 Div. 773.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Oct. 30, 1930.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., Merwin T. Koonce, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ben. G. Perry, Deputy Sol., and Arthur Green, Asst. Deputy Sol., both of Bessemer, for petitioner.
Robert B. Harwood, of Tuscaloosa, and Ross, Bumgardner, Ross & Ross, of Bessemer, opposed.
[MAJORITY — BROWN, J.]
BROWN, J.
The Court of Appeals dismissed the state’s application for rehearing because of a failure to comply with Rule 38, Supreme Court Practice. Code 1923, vol. 4, p. 891.
f Whether or not the rule should be applied and enforced in the particular case to which the rule applies was a matter addressed to the irrevisable discretion of the Court of Appeals. Caraway v. State, 207 Ala. 588, 93 So. 548; Brewington v. State, 19 Ala. App. 409, 97 So. 763.
Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.