Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Virginia v. Maryland
355 U.S. 946·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 12,
Original.
Virginia v. Maryland.
C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General, Joseph S. Kaufman, Assistant Attorney General, and Edward S. Digges, Special Assistant Attorney General, filed an answer to the Bill of Complaint for the State of Maryland, defendant. For previous decision of the Court, see 355 U. S. 269.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that Mr. Justice Reed (retired) be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this cause, with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such„ evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to hold hearings with all convenient speed, and to submit a report with recommendations relative to the disposition of the questions raised by the pleadings.
The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his stenographic and clerical assistants, and the cost of printing his report shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.