General
BEACH ET AL. V. McCLURE LUMBER CO., ET AL.
170 Ala. 66654 So. 426·Alabama Supreme Court·1910·AL
Dowdell, C. J.. and Anderson, McClellan, Sayre and Evans, JJ., concur in the affirmance, but do not concur in all that is said in the opinion upon the subject of ancient documents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BEACH ET AL. V. McCLURE LUMBER CO., ET AL.
(Decided July 6th, 1910.
Rehearing denied Jan. 12, 1911.
54 South. 426.)
Appeal from Washington Chancery Court.
Heard before Hon. Thomas H. Smith.
Sam Will John, Gregory L. Smith, John R. Tyson, and John W. McAlpine, for appellants.
Stevens & Lyons, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mayfield, J.]
Mayfield, J.
Affirmed on authority of Jordan v. McClure Lumber Co., et al., 170 Ala. 289, 54 South. 415.
Dowdell, C. J.. and Anderson, McClellan, Sayre and Evans, JJ., concur in the affirmance, but do not concur in all that is said in the opinion upon the subject of ancient documents.