General
Florida Citrus Commission et al. v. United States et al.
352 U.S. 1021·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 663.
Florida Citrus Commission et al. v. United States et al.
M. W. Wells, Lewis W. Petteway, R. Y. Patterson, Jr., Karl D. Loos and Frank C. Brooks for appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel M. Friedman, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for 'the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Roland J. Lehman, Robert H. Bierma, John H. Colgren, Alfred S: Knowlton, D. Fred McMullen, Russell L. Frink and Harold B. Wahl for the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. et al., Warren H. Wagner for George A. Hormel & Co. et al., and Nuel D. Belnap for Armour & Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.