Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Manufacturers Trust Co.; and Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
337 U.S. 953·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 386.
No. 443.
Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Manufacturers Trust Co.; and Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner in No. 386 and respondent in No. 443.
Lester E. Denonn and Henry Landau for respondents in No. 386 and petitioner in No. 443.
[MAJORITY]
The motions for leave to filé petitions for rehearing are granted and the petitions for rehearing are granted. The orders entered January 17, 1949, denying certiorari, 335 U. S. 910, are vacated and the petitions for writs- of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit are granted.