Contracts · MBE-tested
Before State Industrial Commission, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of Meyer Lederson, Respondent, for Himself, for Injuries Sustained, under the Workmen's Compensation Law, v. Cassidy & Dorfman, Employer, and Royal Indemnity Company, Insurer, Appellants
197 A.D. 912·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1921·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before State Industrial Commission, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of Meyer Lederson, Respondent, for Himself, for Injuries Sustained, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, v. Cassidy & Dorfman, Employer, and Royal Indemnity Company, Insurer, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Decision amended so as to read as follows: Award reversed, and matter remitted to the Commission for its further consideration. Opinion by John M. Kellogg, P. J. All concur, except Kiley, J., dissenting, with a memorandum. [Reported in 195 App. Div. 613.]