Contracts · MBE-tested
Esedor MATTSON, Appellant, v. LIBBY, MCNEILL & LIBBY, a Corporation, Appellee
63 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Esedor MATTSON, Appellant, v. LIBBY, MCNEILL & LIBBY, a Corporation, Appellee.
No. 7117.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 20, 1933.
Lord, Moulton & Krause, of Portland, Or., for appellant.
Kerr & McCord and Preston, Thorgrimson & Turner, all of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of petition of appellant for an order waiving default and extending time to file record and docket cause, and of motion of appellee to dismiss appeal for failure of appellant to file record and docket' cause, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered motion of appellant denied, and motion of appellee granted, and appeal herein dismissed for failure of appellant to file record and docket cause. »