Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Hanifen v. Price
186 U.S. 481·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 243.
Hanifen v. Price.
On writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Odurt of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Argued April 29, 1902.
Decided June 2, 1902.
Mr. W. P. Preble, Jr., for the petitioner. Mr. Edmund Wetmore, for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Decree affirmed, with costs, by a divided court, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for-Southern District of
New York.-