Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Third National Bank of Buffalo, Appellant, v. Lucien T. Cornes et al., Respondents
102 N.Y. 737·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Third National Bank of Buffalo, Appellant, v. Lucien T. Cornes et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 8, 1886;
decided June 25, 1886.)
The sole question in this case was one of fact, upon which the court hold the findings of the referee affirmed by the General Term to be conclusive.
Adelbert Moot for appellant.
Frank R. Perkins for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Ouriam]
Per Ouriam
opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.