Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Election of Directors of Glen Salt Company. Glen Salt Company et al., Appellants; Bradley Salt Company et al., Respondents
153 N.Y. 688·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Election of Directors of Glen Salt Company. Glen Salt Company et al., Appellants; Bradley Salt Company et al., Respondents.
Matter of Glen Salt Co., 17 App. Div. 334, affirmed.
(Argued June 22, 1897;
decided October 5, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 12, 1897, which affirmed that portion of an order of Special Term reading as follows: “That upon May 26, 1896, George C. Otis was not the owner in fact of this one hundred forty shares of stock transferred to him on the hooks of the Glen Salt Company from John A. Chite; that the said George C. Otis’ application to vacate said temporary injunction be and the same is hereby denied, and said injunction is hereby sustained.”
Frederick Collin for appellants.
Edward Q. llerendeen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed on opinion below, with costs.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.