General

John G. Burgdorf et al. v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of South Windsor

13 Conn. App. 814·Connecticut Appellate Court·1988·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

John G. Burgdorf et al. v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of South Windsor (5535) Borden, O’Connell and Stoughton, Js. Argued January 6 — decision released February 10, 1988 Ralph J. Alexander, town attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Richard M. Rittenband, former town attorney, for the appellant (defendant). Ronald P. Sherlock, with whom, on the brief, was James W. Sherman, for the appellees (plaintiffs). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Subsequent to the oral argument in this appeal, the plaintiffs moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground of mootness. On the basis of the briefs of the parties on the motion, and on the hearing held thereon, we conclude that the appeal is moot. The plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss is granted; the appeal is dismissed.