Torts · MBE-tested
Mary V. Cox et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent
196 A.D.2d 855603 N.Y.S.2d 759·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1993·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary V. Cox et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.
[603 NYS2d 759]
[MAJORITY]
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), entered June 3, 1991, which denied their motion pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.