General
William R. Neal v. United States, reappraisements R60/16448, etc. (Port Huron)
57 Cust. Ct. 849·United States Customs Court·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. R66/54.
William R. Neal v. United States, reappraisements R60/16448, etc. (Port Huron).
[MAJORITY — Bao, C. J.]
Bao, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those in United States v. Acme Steel Company (51 CCPA 81, C.A.D. 841), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper statutory basis for the determination of the value of the steel strap in issue and that such value is the invoiced unit price.