Corporations
Charles W. Peterson et al. v. City of Norwalk et al.
150 Conn. 716·Connecticut Supreme Court·1962·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles W. Peterson et al. v. City of Norwalk et al.
(No. 5270)
Robert B. Seidman, with whom was Sidney Vogel, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
■ Thomas J. O’Sullivan, for the appellee (defendant The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company).
[MAJORITY]
The plaintiffs’ motion for continuance (erroneously labeled “Motion to Dismiss”) is denied.
David S. Maclay, with whom was Peter Wilkinson, for the appellee (defendant United Aircraft Corporation).
Louis Weinstein, assistant attorney general, with whom was Samuel Kanell, assistant attorney general, for the Public Utilities Commission.
Argued December 5
decided December 5, 1962