General
FERRIOT v. ATLANTIC, W. & N. R. CO. et al.
253 F. 987·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FERRIOT v. ATLANTIC, W. & N. R. CO. et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 6, 1918.)
No. 3244.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia; Emory Speer, Judge. Suit by Henry C. Ferriot against the Atlantic, Waycross & Northern Railroad Company and another. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
Winfield P. Jones, of Allanta, Ga., and Arihur H. Browne, and Sam A. Montgomery, both of New Orleans, Ha., for appellant. Sheppard Bryan, of Atlanta, Ga. (Grover Middlebrooks, of Atlanta, Ga., on the brie!') for appellees.
Before WALKER and BATTS, Circuit Judges, and SHEPPARD, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Findings of fact, made by the special master and approved by the Dial court, were to the effect that the evidence adduced did not sustain the claims asserted by the bill. Those findings fully justified the decree dismissing the bill. In our opinion the record does not disclose anything that would warrant a reversal of the decree appealed from. That decree is affirmed.