Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. et al.; and Federal Power Commission v. Marr et al.
380 U.S. 969·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 644.
No. 693.
United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. et al.; and Federal Power Commission v. Marr et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. (Certiorari granted, 379 U. S. 958.) Motion of Southern California Gas Co. et al. for leave to file brief, as •amici curiae, in Nos. 644 and 693 granted. Motion of State of California et al. for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, in No. 693 granted. John Ormasa, L. T. Rice, J. David Mann, Jr., and John E. Holtzinger, Jr., for Southern California Gas Co. et al. Richard E. Tuttle and J. Calvin Simpson for State of California et al.