Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Thomas Kitson, Respondent, v. Sarah F. Blake, Appellant; Same Respondent, v. Frederick D. Blake, Appellant
128 N.Y. 609·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Kitson, Respondent, v. Sarah F. Blake, Appellant. Same Respondent, v. Frederick D. Blake, Appellant.
(Argued June 15, 1891;
decided June 23, 1891.)
Motions to dismiss appeals from orders of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made May 13, 1891, which affirmed orders of Special Term refusing to set aside inquests and open judgment in favor of plaintiff in the above entitled actions.
Carlisle Norwood, Jr., for motions.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motions; no opinion.
All concur.
Motions granted.