Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. John Timmerman, Respondent
179 N.Y. 550·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. John Timmerman, Respondent.
People v. Timmerman, 79 App. Div. 565, affirmed.
(Submitted June 15, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 16, 1903, which reversed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York convicting the defendant of a violation of the Sanitary Code of the city of New York and granted a new trial.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly of counsel), for appellant.
James E. Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gras:, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.