Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Joseph M. Warren et al., as Surviving Trustees, etc., Respondents, v. The Bigelow Blue Stone Company, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Application of Helen M. Kellogg, a Stockholder, Appellant
142 N.Y. 669·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph M. Warren et al., as Surviving Trustees, etc., Respondents, v. The Bigelow Blue Stone Company, et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Application of Helen M. Kellogg, a Stockholder, Appellant.
(Argued April 23, 1894;
decided May 4, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made December 6, 1893, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying an application by Helen M. Kellogg to intervene and be made a party defendant.
L. Lafiin Kellogg for appellant.
Henry A. King for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal, dismissed.