Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In re Vendo Co.
435 U.S. 994·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 77-1131.
In re Vendo Co.
[MAJORITY]
On February 10, 1978, petitioner filed for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus and further prayed that a writ of mandamus issue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois directing the District Court to dissolve the preliminary injunction in Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co. In Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp., 433 U. S. 623 (1977), this Court had held that the preliminary injunction violated the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U. S. C. § 2283. The Court has now been advised of an order entered on April 6, 1978, dissolving the injunction in accordance with the judgment of this Court. Petitioner’s motion is therefore dismissed as moot.