Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service
346 U.S. 892·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Clark would deny the application without prejudice to an application to proper authority.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 366.
United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 346 U. S. 884, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The application for bail is granted and it is ordered that petitioner, Joseph Accardi, be admitted to bail upon the posting of a good and sufficient surety bond in the amount of twenty-five hundred ($2,500) dollars. The bond is to be approved by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York or a judge thereof and when approved to be filed with the clerk of that court.
Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice Clark would deny the application without prejudice to an application to proper authority.