General
Hirsh & Schofield, Inc., Appellant, v. Aage Gusmer, Respondent
171 A.D. 935·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hirsh & Schofield, Inc., Appellant, v. Aage Gusmer, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 10th day of November, 1915, denying a motion for the continuance of a temporary injunction pendente lite.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Without determining whether or not the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction by final judgment after a trial of the action, we think the court was justified in refusing to continue the temporary injunction. The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Smith, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.