Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Williamson, Attorney General, et al. v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. et al.; and Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. et al. v. Williamson, Attorney General
348 U.S. 949·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 184.
No. 185.
Williamson, Attorney General, et al. v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. et al.; and Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. et al. v. Williamson, Attorney General.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. Probable jurisdiction noted, 348 U. S. 854. The motion for leave to file brief of Pennsylvania Optical Co., as amicus curiae, is denied.