Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Warehousemen's Union, Local 117, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and McKesson & Robbins, Inc. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board
314 U.S. 674·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 627.
No. 628.
Warehousemen’s Union, Local 117, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and McKesson & Robbins, Inc. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.
October 27, 1941.
Messrs. Joseph A. Pad-way and Herbert S. Thatcher for petitioner in No. 627. Mr. Clinton Robb for petitioners in No. 628. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Richard H. Demuth, Robert B- Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, and Morris P. Glushien for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Reported below: 121F. 2d 84.