General
I. Fleischer & Sons, Respondent, vs. Goodrich & Martineau Company, Appellant
189 Wis. 412·Wisconsin Supreme Court·1926·WI
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
I. Fleischer & Sons, Respondent, vs. Goodrich & Martineau Company, Appellant.
February 11
March 9, 1926.
Mayfield Woolen Mills v. Goodrich & Martineau Co., ante, p. 406, followed.
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Oconto county: W. B. Quinlan, Circuit Judge.
Reversed.
The appeal is from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor.
For the appellant there was a brief by Classon, Whitcomb & Kuzenski of Oconto, and oral argument by Walter F. Kuzenski and Allan V. Classon.
For the respondent there was a brief by Megan & Megan of Oconto, and oral argument by Giles Megan.
[MAJORITY — Doerfler, J.]
Doerfler, J.
This case is ruled by the case of Mayfield Woolen Mills v. Goodrich & Martineau Co., ante, p. 406, 207 N. W. 954.
By the Court. — The judgment of the lower court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion in the Mayfield Woolen Mills Case, supra.