Bankruptcy
WIDEWATERS VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, Creditor-Appellant, v. Stacey B. HAYWOOD; Theodore A. Haywood, Debtors-Appellees
450 F. App'x 238·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·2011
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WIDEWATERS VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, Creditor-Appellant, v. Stacey B. HAYWOOD; Theodore A. Haywood, Debtors-Appellees.
No. 10-1810.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2011.
Decided: Oct. 11, 2011.
Nelson G. Harris, Harris & Hilton, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. William E. Brewer, Jr., Law Office of William E. Brewer, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Widewaters Village Community Association, Inc., appeals from the district court’s order upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that the Association’s claim in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy case of Stacey B. and Theodore A. Haywood was an unsecured claim and its hen may be avoided. Our review of the record and the briefs filed by the parties discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Widewaters Village Community Association, Inc. v. Haywood, No. 5:09-cv-00067-F (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.