General
U. S. Rubber Co. v. United States
20 Cust. Ct. 251·United States Customs Court·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Second Division,
January 15, 1948
No. 52117.
protest 120507-K (Los Angeles).
U. S. Rubber Co. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Tilson, J.]
Opinion by
Tilson, J.
The record showed that the imported merchandise is used in conjunction with other articles, not imported, in the manufacture or production of automobile tires. However, the record failed to establish that the imported merchandise is an integral, constituent, or component part without which the article to which it is to be joined could not function as such article. The evidence likewise failed to establish that the article to which the imported merchandise is to bp joined, is a machine, in and of itself. On the record presented the protest was overruled for failure of proof.