Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Capital Service, Inc., doing business as Danish Maid Bakery, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board
346 U.S. 936·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 398.
Capital Service, Inc., doing business as Danish Maid Bakery, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for writ of certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is granted limited to the following question:
“In view of the fact that exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter was in the National Labor Relations Board (Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U. S. 485), could the Federal District Court, on application of the Board, enjoin Petitioners from enforcing an injunction already obtained from the State Court?”
Carl M. Gould for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come filed a memorandum for respondent.