Torts · MBE-tested
William Rockefeller, Respondent, v. Oliver Lamora, Appellant
186 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Rockefeller, Respondent, v. Oliver Lamora, Appellant.
Rockefeller v. Lamora, 106 App. Div. 345, affirmed.
(Argued October 18, 1906;
decided November 13, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of - the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 5,1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover a penalty under the provisions of the Forest, Fish and Game Law because of defendant’s trespassing upon and taking fish from a stream where it flowed across plaintiff’s private park.
J. Newton Fiero for appellant.
John P. Fellas for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight,Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.