General
Roseen Bros., Inc., Respondent, v. Gladys Manning and Others, Defendants. Frank Blum, Appellant
223 A.D. 786·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Roseen Bros., Inc., Respondent, v. Gladys Manning and Others, Defendants. Frank Blum, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order denying motion of defendant Frank Blum to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.