Corporations
Richard P. Carrigan, Respondent, v. London Taxi Corporation, Appellant, and Charles Campbell, Defendant
223 A.D. 860·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard P. Carrigan, Respondent, v. London Taxi Corporation, Appellant, and Charles Campbell, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order denying motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence as to the injury to plaintiff’s eyes was given without objection. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.