General
Charles H. Erwin, Respondent, v. Josiah Curtis, Administrator, etc., Appellant
112 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles H. Erwin, Respondent, v. Josiah Curtis, Administrator, etc., Appellant.
(Argued December 14, 1888;
decided January 15, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made the first Tuesday of January, 1887, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the decision of the court at Special Term, and a final judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
A. S. Kendall for appellant.
George T. Spencer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.