General

In the Matter of Florine Maze, Petitioner, v. Irving S. Aronin, Respondent

207 A.D.2d 896616 N.Y.S.2d 984·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1994·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of Florine Maze, Petitioner, v Irving S. Aronin, Respondent. [616 NYS2d 984] [MAJORITY] —Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the Supreme Court, Kings County, to punish the respondents in the proceeding entitled Matter of Maze v Claude, Kings County Index No. 15384/94, for contempt of court. Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.