Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Jedediah D. Maynard, Appellant, v. Melissa Anderson, Respondent
54 N.Y. 641·New York Commission of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jedediah D. Maynard, Appellant, v. Melissa Anderson, Respondent.
(Argued March 8, 1873;
decided June term, 1873.)
Where one having a lien upon a chattel in his possession, upon its being demanded by the owner, does not disclose his lien, but claims to be the owner, he is estopped from setting up his lien in an action to recover possession.
This was an action to recover possession of a piano. Plaintiff had contracted for the sale of the piano to one Hawks for fifty dollars cash and the note of the latter for $350; he to have possession, but the title to remain in plaintiff until the purchase money was paid. The fifty dollars was paid and, Hawks received the piano, but did not pay the note. He subsequently pledged the piano to defendant to secure the payment of forty-two dollars. Hpon demand, she refused to deliver np the piano, claiming to own it. Held, as above; also held, on authority of Ballard v. Burgett (40 H. Y., 314), that the title remained in plaintiff, and that a purchaser in good faith and for value from Hawks could obtain no title as against plaintiff.
M. F. Jenkins for the appellant.
Henderson & Wentworth for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Johnson, C.,]
Johnson, C.,
reads for reversal of order of General Term granting a new trial, and affirmance of judgment entered on report of referee.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.