Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
William MILLER, Appellee, v. GREAT LAKES STAGES CO., Inc., Appellant
54 F.2d 1080·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William MILLER, Appellee, v. GREAT LAKES STAGES CO., Inc., Appellant.
No. 84.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Dec. 7, 1931.
Lathrop & Whiting, of Buffalo, N. Y., (Clinton H. Lathrop, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant.
White & Rugg, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Ford White, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and'CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In this case the only question is whether the facts were so clearly in the defendant’s favor as to require the direction of a verdict; that is, whether no reasonable men could accept the plaintiff’s version. Though we should all have decided otherwise, were we upon the panel, and the evidence is such as to make it a close question whether we should intervene, we are not satisfied that it is so extreme a case as to justify this unusual action. We cannot believe that the plaintiff’s ear was pushed for so long a distance, either upright or upset; but that belief is founded upon our general notions in which it is conceivably possible that we may be mistaken. On the whole record we are not prepared to say that the case should have been taken from the jury.
Judgment affirmed.