Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
Parsons Brothers (Incorporated), Appellant, v. The City of New York et al., Respondents
184 N.Y. 604·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Parsons Brothers (Incorporated), Appellant, v. The City of New York et al., Respondents.
Parsons Brothers (Incorporated) v. City of New York, 107 App. Div. 324, affirmed.
(Argued March 26, 1906;
decided April 17, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 3, 1905, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial.
Conrad Saxe Keyes for appellant.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell and Patrich E. Callahan of counsel) for city of Hew York, respondent. .
James A. G. Johnson for the Hilton & Dodge Lumber Company et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Webneb, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Bbien, J.