General
Rochester Lead Works, Incorporated, Respondent, v. William G. Irr, Doing Business under the Assumed Name and Style of Irr & Son, and Henry M. Dechert, Inc., Appellants
263 A.D. 935·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1942·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rochester Lead Works, Incorporated, Respondent, v. William G. Irr, Doing Business under the Assumed Name and Style of Irr & Son, and Henry M. Dechert, Inc., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies a motion for change of venue.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCum, JJ.